<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HDC reacts to the South Street Seaport Plan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hdc.org/blog/2008/10/17/hdc-reacts-to-the-south-street-seaport-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hdc.org/blog/2008/10/17/hdc-reacts-to-the-south-street-seaport-plan/</link>
	<description>News, Views and Reports from New York City&#039;s Preservation Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 21:03:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moving the Old Fulton Fish Market&#8217;s Building - City Room Blog - NYTimes.com</title>
		<link>http://hdc.org/blog/2008/10/17/hdc-reacts-to-the-south-street-seaport-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Moving the Old Fulton Fish Market&#8217;s Building - City Room Blog - NYTimes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdc.org/blog/?p=1302#comment-70</guid>
		<description>[...] The proposed relocation of Alexander Hamilton&#8217;s 206-year-old home in Harlem was considered successful. But the proposed relocation of the historic home of the Fulton Fish Market, to make way for a new complex at the seaport that includes a 42-story tower, have drawn protests from preservationists.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The proposed relocation of Alexander Hamilton&#8217;s 206-year-old home in Harlem was considered successful. But the proposed relocation of the historic home of the Fulton Fish Market, to make way for a new complex at the seaport that includes a 42-story tower, have drawn protests from preservationists.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry Nally</title>
		<link>http://hdc.org/blog/2008/10/17/hdc-reacts-to-the-south-street-seaport-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry Nally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Oct 2008 13:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdc.org/blog/?p=1302#comment-60</guid>
		<description>As a 25 year tenent of Pier 17 I made similar points to a release yesterday by the architects for GGP in regard to their design. These people are paid to design, again and again, using all kinds of excuses why something should be made defunct.

Even McNaughtons reference to the Seaport &quot;stank&quot; as an excuse. GGP is from Chicago, what would he know, he most likely never even visited the Seaport since 1985 when the Pier 17 opened. Well I was there that first day and did $10,000 in sales and tenants paid to clean the streets daily sice then. What a stupid comment, but typical of &quot;Developers&quot; looking for excuses.

Seaport Watch Company, Gerry Nally</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a 25 year tenent of Pier 17 I made similar points to a release yesterday by the architects for GGP in regard to their design. These people are paid to design, again and again, using all kinds of excuses why something should be made defunct.</p>
<p>Even McNaughtons reference to the Seaport &#8220;stank&#8221; as an excuse. GGP is from Chicago, what would he know, he most likely never even visited the Seaport since 1985 when the Pier 17 opened. Well I was there that first day and did $10,000 in sales and tenants paid to clean the streets daily sice then. What a stupid comment, but typical of &#8220;Developers&#8221; looking for excuses.</p>
<p>Seaport Watch Company, Gerry Nally</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
