Certificate of Appropriateness Testimony

HDC@LPC Testimony for February 24, 2026

PUBLIC HEARING TESTIMONY

LPC-26-06063

145 Wyckoff Street – Boerum Hill Historic District

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS

A modified Italianate style rowhouse built in 1867-68. Application is to construct a rear yard addition.

The Historic Districts Council finds the proposed rear yard addition to be modest in scale and generally appropriate to the building and its context. We appreciate that the building will remain in multifamily use, preserving its historic residential function.

However, we encourage the applicant to reconsider the design of the new balcony and guardrail elements. Given the retention of the historic fire escape and its distinct steel vocabulary, the new metalwork would be more harmonious if it drew upon the proportions and character of the existing ironwork and similar features found on neighboring buildings. A more sympathetic design approach would better integrate the addition into the historic rear façade composition.

Action: Approval.


LPC-26-01129 

317 Jefferson Avenue – Bedford Historic District

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 

A neo-Grec style rowhouse designed by William Taylor and built c. 1882. Application is to alter the front and rear façades, and construct a rooftop bulkhead and rear yard addition.

Architect: Gerald J. Caliendo Architects

The Historic Districts Council finds the proposed rooftop addition generally restrained in scale; however, we are concerned about the details of the project. 

We are concerned that the renderings and construction drawings appear inconsistent with one another, particularly with regard to parapet articulation and dormer detailing. We also find that the proportions and detailing of the mansard and dormers appear unresolved. The dormers, as currently proposed, appear squat and overly compressed, and the relationship between the dormers, cornice, and mansard roof lacks the clarity and balance typically seen in historic precedent.

We recommend that the applicant work closely with staff to refine the proportions, window configurations, and detailing to achieve a more coherent and historically appropriate composition. With careful adjustment, this addition could be made more consistent with the architectural character of the building and district.

Action: Approval.


LPC-26-05966

1184 Dean Street – Crown Heights North Historic District

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 

A Romanesque Revival style rowhouse designed by Magnus Dahlander and built c. 1893. Application is to replace windows.

The Historic Districts Council opposes the applicant’s proposal to replace the previously approved curved glass window sashes with straight sashes. Curved sashes are an essential feature of curved-front buildings and were appropriately approved at the staff level. The applicant’s cited precedents are not relevant, as they show unrenovated buildings, while their own examples at 810 and 796 Union Street demonstrate that curved glass sashes are both appropriate and achievable.

We also question the claimed hardship. Based on consulting expertise, we understand that curved glass sashes typically cost only 25–30% more than straight sashes. We therefore urge the Commission to require the use of curved glass sashes, as previously approved, to preserve the building’s historic character.

In addition, we note that these presentation materials were uploaded late, providing insufficient time for the public to review prior to the hearing.

Action: No Action. Review cost of curved sash windows with staff.


LPC-26-02927 

20 King Street – Charlton-King-Vandam Historic District

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 

A Greek Revival style rowhouse built in 1841. Application is to construct a rear yard
addition, modify the roof and install a bulkhead and railings, replace windows, remove metal lintel caps, and install a stoop gate.

Architect: Wiskup Projects

The Historic Districts Council objects to the extent and character of the proposed alterations to this highly intact Greek Revival row house.

The rear yard addition, in particular, is poorly proportioned and introduces large, horizontally oriented openings that are incompatible with the vertically oriented fenestration pattern of the historic façade. The resulting composition evokes a garage-like condition that is inappropriate for a building of this age and significance. The masonry openings, fenestration pattern, and overall proportions require reconsideration.

In addition, the proposed replacement of historic windows and removal of metal lintel caps should be avoided unless their deterioration and lack of historic significance can be clearly demonstrated.

This building retains a high degree of historic integrity, and any interventions should be significantly more sensitive to its character.

Action: Approval.


LPC-25-07016

41-43 Mercer Street – SoHo-Cast Iron Historic District

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS

A store and storehouse building (no. 43) designed by Henry Fernbach and built in 1868, and a one-story garage (no. 41). Application is to demolish the garage (no. 41) and construct a new building, remove the party wall and combine the buildings, and replace storefront infill and construct rooftop and rear yard additions at no 43.

Architect: Alexandr Neratoff

The Historic Districts Council appreciates the thoughtful effort to design a new infill building that responds to the scale and rhythm of the district. We find the proposed height and massing are generally appropriate, but question two details.

One, we find the rear façade’s materiality and fenestration to be inconsistent with the historic building and district. The rear façade should be constructed in brick rather than stucco to better reflect the historic character of the building type, and the fenestration should be more uniform to align with traditional patterns found in the district.

Two, we recommend reconsideration of the column design on the front façade. While conceptually strong, there is concern that the recessed steel plate construction could attract bird nesting and eventually require netting, compromising the façade’s long-term appearance.

While overall we are supportive of the project, we recommend both of these aspects be further studied.

Action: No action.

LPC-26-06533 

354 Bowery – NoHo Historic District

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 

A stripped Italianate style multiple dwelling with store building built c. 1832 and altered c. 1854. Application is to construct a cantilever over the building and landmark site, associated with an adjacent new building to be constructed outside of the historic district boundaries.

Architect: Fogarty Finger

While the physical impact of the proposed cantilever may be relatively limited, the Historic Districts Council objects to cantilevered encroachments in principle. Allowing cantilevered additions over landmarked buildings establishes a troubling precedent that undermines the integrity and autonomy of historic structures. Even when visually minimal, these additions erode the clarity of historic form and should be avoided.

Action: No Action.

LPC-25-09517 

121 East 7th Street – East Village/Lower East Side Historic District Manhattan

CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 

A former residence originally built in c. 1843-1845, expanded as a Gothic Revival style church-and-rectory building by Frederick Ebeling in c. 1903-1904, and later altered. Application is to construct a rooftop addition, excavate a subcellar, alter the façade and remove the stairs, and remove and modify special windows and doors, religious iconography, and ironwork.

Architect: George Architect

The Historic Districts Council wishes to commend this proposal. The restoration and alterations demonstrate a high level of sensitivity to the building’s historic character.

The façade work is careful and restorative, and the rooftop addition is thoughtfully designed and set back sufficiently to minimize visibility and preserve the building’s silhouette. This project serves as an excellent example of how adaptive reuse and restoration can be accomplished in a manner that respects and enhances a historic structure.

Action: Approved.

 

Help preserve New York’s architectural history with a contribution to HDC

$10 $25 $50 Other >